Mathys Erhard vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf's second serve performance has been slightly better than Mathys Erhard's, with Makhlouf winning 41.95% of points compared to Erhard's 41.88%.
• On return games, Erhard outperforms Makhlouf by winning 51.42% of his opponent's second serve points, whereas Makhlouf achieves 42.73%.
• Under pressure, Makhlouf has a slight edge in saving breakpoints, saving 55.86% compared to Erhard's 52.20%.
• Overall, Erhard has won a higher percentage of matches over the past year (58.06%) than Makhlouf (56.00%).
• Makhlouf excels on hard surfaces with a 57% win rate, unlike Erhard, who performs best on clay at 57% as well.
• At the player level, Makhlouf competes mainly in lower-tier tournaments, while Erhard faces higher-caliber opponents in mid-tier events.
• Quality of opponents is a notable factor; Makhlouf faces players with a higher average rank (262.25) than Erhard's average (368.26).
• In matches that stretch to a deciding set, Erhard shows better performance, winning 53% of these instances compared to Makhlouf's 40%.

Editorial Prediction (October 8, 2025, UTC):

The match between Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf and Mathys Erhard seems closely contested when analyzing their recent performances. While Makhlouf displays a slightly stronger second serve, Erhard excels significantly in return games, especially against second serves.

Both players have distinct advantages depending on the surface, with Makhlouf being more proficient on hard courts and Erhard on clay. However, this comparison will depend heavily on the surface where their upcoming match is played.

Considering opponent quality, Makhlouf has been challenged by higher-ranked players, which might give him a competitive edge. Yet, Erhard's ability to win deciding sets makes him formidable in tight situations.

Given recent trends and calculated strengths, Erhard appears to have a slight edge and is more likely to win this match, especially if it reaches a critical point.